LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gov. Scott to White House: stop FAA's furlough

editorial rick scott
Special to the News Bulletin
Published: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 at 11:49 AM.

Gov. Rick Scott sent this letter to President Obama, calling on the White House to avoid the Federal Aviation Administration's furlough of air controllers that began April 21.  

Dear Mr. President:

On your March 29th visit to Miami, you highlighted the importance of transportation services to jobs and our nation’s economy; yet, today the Federal Aviation Administration will begin to furlough 10 percent of the nation’s air controllers because of sequestration.  

  These furloughs will have a devastating impact on Florida families by creating unnecessary delays that will impact Florida airports. According to the Florida Department of Transportation, with Florida airports accommodating more than 142 million passengers annually, we would experience a direct economic output reduction of $19 million annually, or $1.6 million per month.

Florida communities will be disproportionately impacted by these furloughs, as we are the only state in the nation with four large hub airports, including Orlando International, Tampa International, Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International and Miami International.

Moreover, these furloughs would create a ripple effect, causing additional delays at other hub airports such as Jacksonville International, Southwest Florida International and Palm Beach International. These delays will cost time and resources, hinder domestic and international commerce, and undoubtedly have long-term consequences for Florida’s tourism industry, which all impact Florida families.

Equally disturbing is that the $637 million in reductions that the U.S. Department of Transportation claims requires furloughs, could be addressed with commonsense budgeting. As the chairman of the U.S. House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure pointed out, the FAA’s budget has increased by 100 percent in less than two decades, and the FAA has $2.7 billion in non-personnel spending that could be utilized to help mitigate impacts to critical personnel.



1 2
Next

Reader comments posted to this article may be published in our print edition. All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be re-published without permission. Links are encouraged.

COMMENTS
▲ Return to Top
 

Local Faves